|
So what’s the fuss about old guys in
their underwear? It’s an everyday occurrence at our house. But a couple of
weeks back the entire world seemed to have its collective panties in a wad
over a picture of Saddam Hussein in his “tighty whities”. Published in
London and New York City tabloids better known for pics of Pamela Anderson
in the altogether, the world community professed outrage. (Not to sound
homophobic but I much prefer gazing at Pamela in lingerie as opposed to
color photographs of an imprisoned geezer dictator in his Under-oos.)
Saddam was supposedly so mortified
he’s threatening to sue. To which one must respond, “Oh bite me!” Here’s a
despot responsible for murdering hundreds of thousands, a man who “offed”
his own son-in-laws, and he’s bent out of shape because the world has seen
him in nothing but his Fruit Of The Looms? Like one picture of him in a
Munsingwear pair is going to ruin his bad reputation.
The Bush Administration chimed in
with dismay over the pictures of Saddam in his BVD’s saying the picture’s
publication would cause the Arab world to hate us to an even greater
degree. Excuse me? Folks in the Middle East are already so hacked off with
the West they blow themselves to kingdom come on a daily basis. Just how is
seeing the “Butcher of Baghdad” in his Jockey’s going to cause them to be
even more P.O’d?
Other than providing cannon fodder
for late night comedians, “In London and New York newspapers published a
picture of Sadam Hussein revealing where he keeps his weapon of mass
destruction” and getting in a “Revenge of the Stith” mode by announcing
Saddam was the apparent winner of the Chewbacca look alike contest, what’s
the problem with showing up in “People” in nothing but your Calvin
Klein’s? Rappers do it all the time, why not dictators?
Were it a perfect world I’d live in
my Under-Armour undies. But perfect the world ain’t. After all a man’s
morning ablutions include heading outdoors to the driveway for newspaper
retrieval and my wife assures me performing that chore in just my Tommy
Hilfiger’s would ruin the breakfast of our South Rim neighbors. According
to the better half, me stumbling around the yard in nothing but J Crew
briefs could be as egregious a homeowners association rules violation as, on
a non-collection day, leaving the garbage can where it’s visible to a
neighbor’s naked eye. Keep in mind up where I live a visible garbage can
violation is an etiquette breach so heinous it demands a “tut-tut” phone
call from a homeowner’s association official, our neighborhoods version of a
“cease and desist” order.
Someone needs to clue Saddam in to
running shorts. Available in every hue known to a rainbow, running shorts
are more comfortable than briefs while being acceptable dress in worlds as
divergent as picking up the morning paper on Redlands or being interrogated
by CIA operatives in a military prison.
Now an Iraqi judge tells us Saddam is
depressed. Probably that news bothered you almost as much as it did me.
One would guess he’s just going through withdrawal, as it has been over a
year since he’s been allowed to torture, murder or execute a single soul.
Maybe his honor could have the bailiff stop by Wally-World and pick up a “3
pair for $3.99” package of “tighty whities”. New underwear is supposedly a
sure way to improve one’s mental outlook. |