|
| |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Stuff! |
New Stuff! |
|
Videos? |
|
|
|
|
|
Winner Announced in
Dumbest Coloradoan Contest!! |
|
By
LE ROY STANDISH
The Daily Sentinel
Friday, May 02, 2008
An
18-year-old man rushed himself to the hospital this morning with burns to
his hands after a gas-siphoning scheme backfired on him early Friday
morning, according to the Mesa County Sheriff’s Department.
At
approximately 3 a.m. the man peered into a portable gas tank with a
cigarette lighter “to see how full it was,” said Heather Benjamin, Sheriff’s
Department spokeswoman.
The fumes ignited, and his clothes caught on fire, she said.
The teenager and his 19-year-old accomplice apparently were stealing gas
from a boat and a four-wheeler at 541 1/2 Grand Valley Drive in Fruitvale,
Benjamin said.
The Clifton Fire Department was dispatched at 3:19 a.m. and found a gas can
on fire underneath a car port. A torched jacket, which had been extinguished
earlier by a neighbor, was nearby in the middle of the road, Benjamin said.
“Then, just momentarily after that, St. Mary’s (Hospital) notified dispatch
that they had one male that had burns,” she said.
Cody Sellars, 18, of Rifle and Timothy Long, 19, of Grand Junction were
given summonses on suspicion of fourth-degree arson, theft and trespassing,
she said. |
|
|
|
BING
I
think Stanley Bing rocks. Each issue of Fortune finds “Stanley’s not my
real name” next to the back cover with a funny, funny column. His latest is
a piece on “How To Monetize Yourself” a hysterical send-up of the current
“You To Can be a Donald Trump” mania sweeping the business world. Last
month, for the Fortune retirement issue, Bing wrote this longer piece. From
the perspective of a geezer seven years retired this comes closer to the
real world, even if half of it is bs, than all the “How to Have a More
Fulfilling Retirement” crap one is inundated with on a daily basis. Be you
retired or one who finds daily golf years away enjoy Mr. Bing’s thoughts on
the final third of your life.
by
Stanley Bing, FORTUNE Magazine
(FORTUNE Magazine) - For those at the fast end of the food chain, life gets
more pressured and complicated every day. Phones ring. Messages pile up.
Entire coming months hover in the mind, reeking with incident and threat. We
wake at dawn and get into the traces like pack dogs, pulling a sled of
duties until, tongues lolling, we are allowed to curl up and sleep for a few
hours at the end of another grueling day. And as we sleep, we dream,
whimpering and twitching, and what we dream of is a land where biscuits grow
on trees, and there is rest and warmth and happiness and no one to tell us
what to do. We dream of retirement.
Of
course, the smart animals in the endless Iditarod do not simply imagine the
wonders of the next world. We plot. We plan. We believe we prepare. Our
preparation, however, too often focuses solely on the financial aspects of
the trip ahead. We set up trusts. We sock away lump sums. We buy condos in
weird places no person with blood in his veins would live, believing that
because in the past we have enjoyed playing quoits or badminton we will
enjoy doing so every day with a community of elderly strangers. Fie on it!
That way lies madness, senescence, and the early-bird special.
The truth is, those who intend to have a happy retirement must deliver the
goods on the human aspects of the issue as they do on the fiduciary ones.
Unfortunately this takes the kind of cogitation that you, as a reader of
this magazine, are no longer set up to do very well. You've been in business
so long that your mind is accustomed to a fine blend of wishful thinking and
can-do attitudinizing on subjective subjects. "It's gonna be great!" you
tell yourself. "Wake up at noon every day like I did when I was a teenager!
Have a bagel! Play 36 holes! Couple of drinks at the 19th green! Wake up and
do it again the next day! That's what I call living!" Right. Have you
thought about what 25 years of that will be like?
Get this: A life of incessant recreation and indolence is enough to drive
any business entity like you or me mad after 3.5 years. And after you go
mad, you get old. And nobody who is old enjoys his retirement. No, in order
to make your ostensibly golden years work for you, you have to pursue a
strategic plan as rigorous as any you implemented when your hair was as full
and bushy as your ambitions.
The truth is, retirement is a job like any other and must be approached as
such. Some of the sprouts that bloom from this assumption are
counterintuitive. Some are dangerous and defy the exhortations of a medical
establishment that wants us to live to be 120 and pay more for our drool
buckets every year. Some are downright tough to accomplish. But those who do
not put elbow grease into this, the final assignment, end up shuffling in
house slippers through malls. Those who do it right stand before us, full of
beans and good cheer, relaxed, tanned, capes flapping in the breeze, the
apotheosis of all we desire.
Let's take it from day one, the morning you first awaken to the life in
which you are to enjoy the fruits of your lifetime of labor.
First of all, where are you? I hope you're at home. If for the past few
decades that's meant the arid oven that is Phoenix, then by all means, good
for you, enjoy Phoenix. Same goes for Miami. A wonderful place for those who
don't mind the humidity and the naked roller skaters hard by the frightened
old folks pushing their walkers down Collins Avenue. Me, I don't like it
there, so I would never go there simply because I had suddenly entered the
retirement zone. And yet look how many have done so over the years! Why?
Stay put. Where do you think you're going? Someplace new and strange? That's
why God created hotels.
And what about those communities dedicated to like-minded haute bourgeoisie
such as yourself? You like old people, do you? Just because they're old, I
mean? As in, you're going to say to yourself, "Gee, I'm tired of seeing all
these young, vibrant people around and associating with them every day. I'm
going to search out a place where everybody is playing the back nine just
like me. Same interests. Same slacks. Same stories day after day. Same
obsession with bowel movements."
Look at it this way: You're a beautiful flower. You have flourished in the
hard and flinty soil in which you were grown and in which you have raised
your ancillary flora. Now, suddenly, you're going to rip out your roots and
shove them into rich, loamy soil totally unlike any you have ever
experienced? And live there? Really? Before, you were part of a gorgeous
garden, with every sort of plant, shrub, and weed. Now it'll be just you and
the other orchids?
And don't travel too much either. You want to establish a daily grind that,
when necessary, you can escape from. That's why the Interminable Vacation
approach is also bogus. I know a guy who daydreams about getting away in his
little sailboat and disappearing into the sunset. And I wish it for him. And
when all his socks are wet, and there isn't a wrinkle in his body that isn't
filled with salt, I wish him a happy return to where he belongs, in
metropolitan New York. Except when he gets there, several years and
circumnavigations later, he won't have his pipe dream anymore. He'll have
been there and done that. And then what?
Same goes for golf. I know a guy. For ten years all he did was play golf.
"It's heaven!" he would tell me. Then, when he was in his late 60s, his game
deteriorated, naturally. As a competitive individual, he became aggravated
beyond all measure and broke all his clubs and quit. Now he sits and mostly
chews on his lip. Sometimes he gasses up the car.
The conclusion is clear: You've got to keep your hobbies hobbies. They're
called hobbies because you do them to relax, to get your mind off more
serious things. They're not supposed to be done all the time. That's no fun.
Oh, and speaking of the whole notion of fun, don't expect to have it every
day. In fact, make sure that every day you do something that isn't fun. If
you push the fun factor too hard, you'll end up enjoying your retirement as
much as people savor the big mandatory-fun occasions like New Year's.
There's a reason people get loaded that night.
Eat at least four rashers of bacon every day, depending on what your idea of
a rasher is. I've never known the difference between a rasher and a slice,
so I'm going to use them interchangeably. Be that as it may: Bacon is life.
At times you may substitute sausage.
If
you do not, for some reason, eat delicious, greasy, fatty smoked meats,
substitute a tempting portion of the worst food imaginable for you, and eat
some of it every day. Old people are encouraged to eat reasonably. This
ruins their lives and makes them irritable. I know I'm crusty when I don't
get a big slab of meat when I want one.
This is only the first of many bad habits you're going to want to maintain.
I include in this category smoking and drinking, by the way, although
smoking is a nasty habit unless you like it a lot. As for drinking, never
get drunk more than once day. You're not a kid anymore. Less than that,
however, is ill-advised as well, unless you've developed the habit
previously.
Not that you should be completely reckless with yourself. A physical
disaster can really derail you. So chew your food very carefully, and stay
away from those that give you problems. Halibut, for instance, can be dry
and have tiny hidden bones. I don't believe my grandmother ever had a piece
without nearly going into respiratory arrest. She should have stuck to the
chicken. The bones are bigger.
This brings us to the general question of being careful. As you pursue your
retirement, you will become increasingly elderly unless something really bad
happens to you. This is inevitable, but it doesn't have to happen right
away. There are, in short, things you can do to slow down the process. Be
pleasantly reckless when you are able. Again, don't break the mold. If you
never skied a double black diamond, now is not the time to try, unless
you're with a 24-year-old flight attendant who wants you to try it with
her.
Which leads us to the issue of staying in shape. You may think you know what
that means, but you don't, because we've been sold the stupid idea that
there is a perfect shape. There isn't. There's just one that's right for
you.
What is yours? I'm an apple. You may be a pear, in which case I like you.
You may be a stalk of celery, in which case more power to you. Whatever you
are, play the game that got you here, unless you're really fat. I don't know
if you've noticed this, but there are very few very fat very old people.
Make of that what you will.
That's why it makes sense to exercise more than you used to, not less. You
have the time. You want to continue to abuse your body in a million other
ways, so take care of it. That doesn't mean going completely around the bend
and becoming a hardbody for the first time in your life. I can't tell you
how many guys I've known who keeled over about a week after they told me
they were running 25 miles a week and were in the best shape of their life.
This was possibly because they were under the care of doctors. As you go
forward in your busy and fulfilling retirement, avoid contact with
physicians by any means necessary. At your age, the purpose of doctors is to
supervise the long decline and demise of old people. Your goal is to go down
face first in a 28-ounce T-bone at the age of 90. Extensive exposure to
doctors will eliminate that possibility.
SO
WILL LISTENING to all the people who love you. They mean well. But they
don't get it. You're not winding things down. You're ramping up! So don't
hang with your children too much. Visit them. Give presents. And then move
on. You've got fish to fry.
And to do so, you must implement a policy: Always look your best. As you
become older and less attractive, the need for aggressive grooming and
sartorializing grows exponentially. So forget about all those lifelong
aspirations to let it all hang out. Some tips:
* Get a haircut every week, even if you have no hair.
* Don't grow a beard unless you're a woman. But seriously, if you had a
beard before, you may keep it. Other than that, it's a place to store
crumbs.
* Do not take up the wearing of bow ties unless you are attempting to
create a persona where before you had none or are on MSNBC, which amounts to
the same thing.
* Shower regularly. People like smelly old people about as much as they
like smelly young ones.
* Bag the comfy clothing. Wear a jogging suit only if you intend to go
jogging. Always wear a belt, and make it leather or cloth, not shiny
plastic. A belt keeps more than your waist in. It constrains the part of
your personality that wants to sag.
* Wear no spandex. You look terrible in it.
There's a reason to take such good care of yourself. Retirement is a prime
opportunity to bang the gong and get it on.
Yep. That's what I'm talkin' about. Married. Single. Whatever side of the
salad bar you sit on, now is the time to amp up the juice and cut loose. I'm
going to assume that those of you living in connubial bliss may now simply
get a hot tub and continue to explore each other in useful ways. Those who
are on the prowl, however, have a multitude of opportunities. Have an affair
with your yoga instructor! Strike up an acquaintance with that dental
hygienist you've had an eye on since the time you had teeth! Younger people
are often attracted to affluent older individuals who look even marginally
acceptable. I put that in boldface because it's a key insight. You may now
be able to nab someone you had no right to when you were 30.
To
keep that ball in the air, however, you're going to need to spend money like
it's going out of style, purchasing things you don't need and having a
terrific time with the cash you've accumulated. Go! Spend! Your whole
working life you did everything possible to live it up, but you're not on an
expense account anymore. You're spending your own money. And for a while it
will hurt. But push through that and look at the vistas that lie ahead.
Cars! They have so many gorgeous vehicles right now, little deuce coupes and
big fat eight-cylinder limos and cool hybrids that run on ethanol if you're
in California and want to attract a hippie. You're going to need a new car,
you know, because you're going to drive until you can't remember where you
parked. That's the key. If you can't recall where you put it, you won't need
it anymore. Until then, don't let anybody take away your wheels. I'm
interested in a BMW Z4, but you might want one of those big boys that let
you tower over everybody else. So grab a Tahoe, slap a handicapped sticker
on it--even though you're not one bit handicapped, are you, you big
faker!--and roll right up to the front door. Out of the way, losers! Retired
behemoth comin' through!
Speaking of cool machines, you're going to need an iPod, cellphone,
BlackBerry, digital television, HD Radio, whatever they got out there that's
not analog. Get a computer and learn how to use it, even if up until now
that's been your assistant's job. You'll be able to go online and talk to
people who can't see how tiny and wizened you are, and reach out and caress
the entire world, and start being interested in superficial, idiotic, and
distracting things, which is the perfect antidote to the natural drift
you're fighting toward the central questions of existence.
That's it! You're fit. You're well fed. You're in the groove, baby, spending
and wending your way around a world that was made for you. And when you get
tired of all this and run out of money, like everybody told you you would?
Get a job, pal. You didn't think this nonsense was going to last forever,
did you? Ah, yes. Back in the saddle, whatever that saddle may be. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I sure wish I’d written this, but I
didn’t. Anna Quindlen did. Our oldest daughter, she with two boys of her
own, sent this to her Mom. It moved Jan to tears. And it’s a perfect
Mother’s Day thought. |
|
|
On Being Mom (Dad, Parent)
by Anna Quindlen, Newsweek Columnist and Author |
|
If not for the
photographs, I might have a hard time believing they ever existed. The
pensive infant with the swipe of dark bans and the black button eyes of a
Raggedy Andy doll. The placid baby with the yellow ringlets and the high
piping voice. The sturdy toddler with the lower lip that curled into an
apostrophe above her chin.
All my babies are gone
now. I say this not in sorrow but in disbelief. I take great satisfaction
in what I have today: three almost-adults, two taller than I am, one closing
in fast. Three people who read the same books I do and have learned not to
be afraid of disagreeing with me in their opinion of them, who sometimes
tell vulgar jokes that make me laugh until I choke or cry, who need razor
blades and shower gel and privacy, who want to keep their doors closed more
than I like.
Who, miraculously, go
to the bathroom, zip up their jackets and move food from plate to mouth all
by themselves. Like the trick soap I bought for the bathroom with a rubber
ducky at its center, the baby is buried deep within each, barely discernible
except through the unreliable haze of our past.
Everything in all the
books I once pored over is finished for me now. Penelope Leach, T. Berry
Brazelton, Dr. Spock. The ones on sibling rivalry and sleeping through the
night and early-childhood education, all grown obsolete. Along with
Goodnight Moon and Where the Wild Things Are, they are battered, spotted,
well used. But I suspect that if you flipped the pages dust would rise like
memories.
What those books
taught me, finally, and what the women on the playground taught me, and the
well-meaning relations—what they taught me, was that they couldn’t really
teach me very much at all. Raising children is presented at first as a
true-false test, then becomes multiple choice, until finally, far along, you
realize that it is an endless essay. No one knows anything. One child
responds well to positive reinforcement, another can be managed only with a
stern voice and a timeout. One child is toilet trained at 3, his sibling at
2.
When my first child
was born, parents were told to put baby to bed on his belly so that he would
not choke on his own spit-up. By the time my last arrived, babies were put
down on their backs because of research on sudden infant death syndrome. To
a new parent this ever-shifting certainty is terrifying, and then soothing.
Eventually you must
learn to trust yourself. Eventually the research will follow. I remember
15 years ago poring over one of Dr. Brazelton’s wonderful books on child
development, in which he describes three different sorts of infants:
average, quiet, and active. I was looking for a sub-quiet codicil for an
18-month old who did not walk. Was there something wrong with his fat
little legs? Was there something wrong with his tiny little mind? Was he
developmentally delayed, physically challenged? Was I insane? Last year he
went to China. Next year he goes to college. He can talk just fine. He
can walk, too.
Every part of raising
children is humbling, too. Believe me, mistakes were made. They have all
been enshrined in the, “Remember-When-Mom-Did Hall of Fame.” The outbursts,
the temper tantrums, the bad language, mine, not theirs. The times the baby
fell off the bed. The times I arrived late for preschool pickup. The
nightmare sleepover. The horrible summer camp. The day when the youngest
came barreling out of the classroom with a 98 on her geography test, and I
responded, What did you get wrong? (She insisted I include that.) The time
I ordered food at the McDonald’s drive-through speaker and then drove away
without picking it up from the window. (They all insisted I include that.)
I did not allow them to watch the Simpsons for the first two seasons. What
was I thinking?
But the biggest
mistake I made is the one that most of us make while doing this. I did not
live in the moment enough. This is particularly clear now that the moment
is gone, captured only in photographs. There is one picture of the three of
them, sitting in the grass on a quilt in the shadow of the swing set on a
summer day, ages 6,4 and 1. And I wish I could remember what we ate, and
what we talked about, and how they sounded, and how they looked when they
slept that night. I wish I had not been in such a hurry to get on to the
next big thing: dinner, bath, book, bed. I wish I had treasured the doing a
little more and the getting it done a little less.
Even today I’m not
sure what worked and what didn’t, what was me and what was simply life.
When they were very small, I suppose I thought someday they would become who
they were because of what I’d done. Now I suspect they simply grew into
their true selves because they demanded in a thousand ways that I back off
and let them be.
The books said to be
relaxed and I was often tense, matter-of-fact and I was sometimes over the
top. And look how it all turned out. I wound up with the three people I
like best in the world, who have done more than anyone to excavate my
essential humanity.
That’s what the books
never told me. I was bound and determined to learn from the experts. It
just took me a while to figure out who the experts were. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's an English
major in our family. Today thanks to a Masters from CU Denver she's a
special education teacher in Parker, Colorado. Her degree in English from
Cal Poly is not without value. I guarantee she can out conjugate any special
ed teacher west of the Mississippi. The following is from the LA Times West
magazine April 9, 2006.
Eat This Book
by Dan Neil
Here are words that no parent wants to hear: I've decided to major in
English.
I suppose it could be worse. Theater arts, music history. I actually
announced to my parents that I was majoring in creative writing, which is
the rough equivalent—in terms of employment opportunities—to majoring in
liturgical dance.
The English major presents for his or her parents a lexical quandary: What
to call the graduate? My son the geologist, my daughter the physicist—these
ring familiarly. But there is, ironically enough, no word in English for the
English major. Our son the . . . um . . . who speaks English.
The high-minded, lowly employed English major has become a stock comedic
character, most lovingly lampooned by Garrison Keillor's "A Prairie Home
Companion": Is this a spatula which I see before me?/The handle toward my
hand?/And on thy blade brute flesh and dudgeon and gouts of
blood./(DING)/Behold a car approacheth to the window./Now I must do the work
fate sends me./And better it were done quickly.
Occasionally English majors will rise to greatness—astronaut Sally Ride has
a B.A. in English, as well as a not-unhelpful PhD in physics from
Stanford—but in the main, English degrees are regarded as the heart's
triumph over the head, or the degree you get before you learn something
useful. It's rare that the boss asks you to put a PowerPoint presentation
into ottava rima.
And so I was cheered (note the archaic usage, so typical of an English
major) recently when I found Richard A. Lanham's "The Economics of
Attention" amid a forlorn pile of books (personification—again, so typical)
rejected by the book review editor. "The central commodity in our new age of
information is not stuff but style," read the cover blurb. "In such a world,
intellectual property will become more central to the economy than real
property, while the arts and letters will grow to be more crucial than
engineering, the physical sciences, and indeed economics as conventionally
practiced."
Really? No kidding? Sweet! I want to be director of well-turned phrases for
the Federal Reserve.
Actually, Dr. Lanham—a professor emeritus of English at UCLA and a man of
Rabelaisian intellectual appetite (oh, please, Rabelais?)—makes no such
claim in his learned if eccentric book, which will stretch the ligaments of
the best bibliophile (Quintilian, Castiglioni, Peter Drucker, Konrad Lorenz
would make for a handsome game of contract bridge, don't you think?).
What he does say is that in a world freighted and fretted with information
overload, the skills to make sense of it all, to lasso the fleeting
attention of the public, are the old skills. The art and technique of
rhetoric (from the Greek word for "orator") was part of the trivium, the
three-legged stool of a classical liberal education, before "rhetoric"—and
"liberal," for that matter—became a dirty word.
People trained in English and rhetoric are, as Lanham would have it,
information stylists.
Along the way, Lanham—a Yale PhD and general heavy-hitter in humane
letters—makes the argument that the expressive digital space offers
possibilities beyond the ant-marching typography of the printed page. He
proposes that text become more active and dynamic, morphing with meaning,
and he points to shape poems (poems about light bulbs, for example, that
look like light bulbs on the printed page) and Medieval illuminated
manuscripts as early examples of the text as hyper-artifact.
What would this new text paradigm look like? "I'm not sure what comes next,"
Lanham concedes. Yes, me neither. Actually, I was in the weeds back in
Chapter 2.
What I really want to know, as I sit at his dining room table with Lanham
and his wife, Carol (a Latin scholar), is whether English majors really will
inherit the Earth? Will knowing the difference between ottava rima and a
Spenserian sonnet form prepare you for work in a technological society? "You
can't make single connections like that," says Lanham. "You have to look at
what that teaches you about the use of rhythm in your expression, indeed, in
all parts of your life."
Hmm. I don't find this answer that satisfying. All my life I've been looking
for a reason why I had to read "The Faerie Queene." I'm still looking.
English is certainly useful. If, for example, you find yourself in a strange
country—like Georgia. But the fact is English majors must take their
satisfactions as they find them. Lanham pulls out C.S. Lewis' essay on the
compensations of a literary life. "This is the sentence that always gets
me," Lanham says, almost choking up. "'Literary experience heals the wound
without undermining the privilege of individuality.'"
"Looking back on it," he says, "I feel I've dwelt in this immensely rich
world. I've dwelt in marvels and riches."
It's a pity street fights don't end with spelling bees or the consummation
of a hot date doesn't depend on proper conjugation. Studies in literature
are their own reward. However, fries are usually free.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Joel Stein is so good (when he
sticks to the funny stuff)
published in the Los Angeles Times
Valentine's Day 2006 |
Marriage by the numbers
YOU CAN HAVE your chocolate cards and back-massage coupons and hug-o-grams.
For me, Valentine's Day is a reminder that a marriage? like your job,
your house and your child's college? is a competition. What matters
isn't that Cassandra and I have a healthy, growing marriage. What matters is
that no one else have a better marriage.
So when eHarmony, the Pasadena-based online dating service, last week
started a Marriage Wellness Service that rates you on a "Marriage Index"
between 1 and 100, I immediately laid down my $50. More than 45 minutes into
the 310-item questionnaire, I seriously questioned how much I cared about my
marriage.
I also worried, from past experience, if finishing the entire form was going
to make me a Scientologist. The site asked me if I "dislike some people," if
I "sometimes drive faster than the posted speed limit" and if I "sometimes
waste time when I should be working." That last one was particularly easy,
considering that I was filling out a 310-item questionnaire instead of
writing a column.
I was also surprised that the site asked if I was dissatisfied with my
partner's personal hygiene. This is something I assumed you sussed out
early, say, in the first few minutes of the first date. Are people really so
oblivious that they're coming home from work one day 12 years into their
marriage, sniffing around and noticing that their spouses smell like Dom
DeLuise in a heat wave?
After I finished, I was asked to invite Cassandra by e-mail to take part in
our Marriage Wellness program. If e-mail is the way you choose to inform
your spouse that you're seeking marriage help, you've got problems that
eHarmony can't solve.
Cassandra got three e-mails before she responded. After she finally filled
out the survey the next day, we sat down together and checked out our score.
I expected it to say, "Take your $50 back. In fact, we'd like to pay you to
teach us about marriage."
Instead, Cassandra got an 81. I got an 80.
This meant that our marriage was a B-minus. I had a mediocre marriage. I
was, at best, a few grades above the marriage of Charlie Sheen and Denise
Richards. Worse yet, Cassandra was enjoying our marriage one point more than
I was.
In a panic, I clicked on all the diagnostic tools. The eHarmony service
broke our marriage down into a series of bar graphs, which are, of course,
the most valuable tool of the marriage counselor.
There were reams of information to wade through, which depressed both of us.
We were more than willing to have a 79 marriage if it meant we could watch
two episodes of "Lost."
The first thing our "Key Marriage Components" told us was that we had
decision-making and commitment issues. Cassandra firmly disagreed, asking me
what I thought. "I want to know if 81 is better than other people," I said.
The site did help me find out that I'm bad at expressing myself, have an
inflated sense of self, am emotionally distant, can be too rigid, carry on
inappropriately flirtatious relationships and have "ridiculously outlandish
expectations for our sex life." None of this came from eHarmony, mind you,
but Cassandra just kind of took the ball and ran with it.
Just talking about our relationship for a few hours was helpful, if a little
painful. I realized I have to make Cassandra feel more secure, because she
gave me 20 fewer trust points than I gave her. This is particularly
impressive considering that, for reasons I don't fully comprehend, she's on
myspace.com and invited a guy she met there to our next party. What have I
done to undermine her trust? I must have
forgotten the time I had sex with other people in front of her.
And thanks to eHarmony, which suggested I find out Cassandra's favorite
joke, I now know that my wife of four years does not have a favorite joke.
That's the kind of intimacy only a computer-generated marriage evaluation
can get you.
I needed something bigger than knowing Cassandra doesn't like jokes if I
wanted to get up into the 90s by Valentine's Day. I considered a secret
trip, or a roomful of flowers. Then I realized that marriage isn't a big
gesture but a thousand tiny acts of bravery. I'm thinking that we're already
up to an 82. And, if you think about it, that's got to be an A if you live
in Los Angeles.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Another reason to like dollar stores
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
The Irrefutable Laws of Life
Sent my way by Sandi Knudson |
|
Law of Mechanical Repair: After your hands become coated with grease your
nose will begin to itch or you’ll have to pee.
Law of the
Workshop: Any tool, when dropped, will roll to the least accessible corner.
Law of Probability:
The chances of being watched are directly proportional to the stupidity of
the act.
Law of the Telephone: When you dial a
wrong number you will never get a busy signal.
Law of the Alibi: If you tell the boss you
were late for work because you had a flat tire, the very next morning you
will get a flat tire.
Variation Law: If
you change lines (or traffic lanes) the one you were in will start to move
faster than the one you are in now. (This one never fails)
Bath Theorum: When
the body is fully immersed in water, the telephone rings.
Law of Close
Encounters: The probability of meeting someone you know increases when you
are with someone you don’t want to be seen with.
Law of the Result:
When you try to prove to someone that a machine won’t work, it will.
Law of the Dentist: Your toothache will
vanish miraculously the minute you walk into the dentist’s office.
Law of Biomechanics: The severity of the
itch is inversely proportional to the reach.
Theater and Stadium rule: The people
occupying the seats furthest from the aisle always arrive last.
Law of Coffee: As soon as you sit down to
a cup of hot coffee, your boss will ask you to do something which will last
until the coffee is cold.
Murphy’s Law of Lockers: If there are only
two people in a locker room they will have adjacent lockers.
Law of Dirty Rugs
and Carpets: The chances of an open-faced jelly sandwich landing face down
on a floor covering are direction correlated to the newness and cost of the
carpeting.
Law of “You Said It”: Anything is possible
if you don’t know what you’re talking about.
The law of running shoes: As soon as you
find a pair you really like the manufacturer will drop that model from the
line.
(Are you listening Saucony?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: Unknown---but should win the Nobel Prize for Public Service
As
another year will shortly be a memory, my heartfelt appreciation goes out to
all of you who have taken the time and trouble to send me "forwards" over
the past 12 months
Thank you for making me feel safe, secure, blessed, and wealthy.
Extra thanks for the ones that I have to open 15 times to get to the
message.
Special thanks to whoever sent me the one about rat crap in the glue
onenvelopes 'cause I now have to go get a wet towel every time I need to
seal an envelope.
Also, I scrub the top of every can I open for the same reason. Because
ofyour concern, I no longer drink Coca Cola because it can remove toilet
stains.
I
no longer drink Pepsi, or Dr Pepper, since the people who make theseproducts
are atheists who won't put "Under God" on their cans.
I
no longer use Saran wrap in the microwave because it causes cancer.
I
no longer check the coin return on pay phones because I could be pricked
with a needle infected with AIDS.
I
no longer use cancer-causing deodorants even though I smell like a water
buffalo on a hot day.
I
no longer go to shopping malls because someone might drug me with a perfume
sample and rob me.
I
no longer receive packages from, nor send packages by UPS, or FedEx, since
they are actually Al Qaeda in disguise.
I
no longer answer the phone, because someone will ask me to dial a number for
which I will get a phone bill with calls to Jamaica, Uganda, Singapore,and
Uzbekistan.
I
no longer eat KFC, because their "chickens" are actually horrible mutant
freaks with no eyes or feathers.
I
no longer have any sneakers -- but that will change once I receive my free
replacement pair from Nike.
I
no longer have to buy expensive cookies from Neiman Marcus, since I now have
their recipe.
I
no longer worry about my soul, because at last count I have 363,214 angels
looking out for me.
Thanks to you, I have learned that God only answers my prayers if I
forward an e-mail to seven of my friends and make a wish within five
minutes.
I
no longer have any savings, because I gave it to a sick girl who is
about to die in the hospital (for the 1,387,258th time)
I
no longer have any money at all - but that will change once I receive the
$15,000 that Microsoft and AOL are sending me for participating in their
special email program. Plus there are people
all over Africa willing to give me millions if I’ll just help them smuggle
US funds out of their country.
Yes, I want to thank you so much for looking out for me that I will now
return the favor!
If
you don't send this e-mail to at least 144,000 people in the next 7minutes,
a large pigeon with a wicked case of diarrhea will land on your head at 5:00
PM (ET) this afternoon. I know this will occur because it actually happened
to a friend of mine's next door neighbor's ex-mother-in-law's second
husband's cousin's beautician. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ski Iowa |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you
pick out the Iowa Girl? |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Video? We got your stinking video. |
 |
|
|
|
|
My Kinda Country
Vince Gill is da man
(& the woman) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why geezers
need cell phones |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garbage Man |
|
Juggler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|